Search on
News Title
News Details
Reports/Directory
Glossary
Title_head
Bahrain postpones nuclear energy plans
935 times viewed.
Monday, 22 Oct 2012
EmailButton
Pdf_button

Trade Arabia reported that Bahrain has postponed its plans to adopt nuclear energy as a source of power by 2017.

Mr Fahmi Al Jowder former Electricity and Water Affairs Minister of Bahrain had earlier announced that experts were being brought in to study the move and set up facilities in conjunction with other Gulf countries.

Sources confirmed the proposals had been sidelined. That project will not happen by 2017. The news emerged as scientists, engineers and industry specialists agreed Bahrain would be unable to host a nuclear power plant, during a session entitled 'Renewable or Nuclear Energy.

Hundreds of scientists, high ranking government officials and leading businessmen and women from around the world have gathered to help Bahrain draft a practical strategy for going green. They will discuss the technical and legal aspects of renewable energy and ways to develop a strategy for Bahrain as the event concludes.

Dr August Schlapfer German University of Flensburg director of energy and environmental management in developing countries said that "When people say nuclear power is clean, it is true if you look at a ready built and running plant. But when you look at a nuclear power plant you have to know that the facility itself and the mining that happens to supply the radioactive material have a huge footprint.

Dr Schlapfer said that a more pressing issue is that Bahrain is a very small nation and space for a nuclear power plant is doubtful. These facilities need to be as far away from major populations as possible. So I don't know if the people of Bahrain would like to have a nuclear facility close to where they stay. Safety is always a concern. Although the risk of a catastrophic failure is minimal, it has dire consequences for example look at the Japanese power station.

He said that Bahrain's lack of expertise in the field and resources would hinder any plans to adopt nuclear energy. He also questioned the cost efficiency of the plan. The price of the facilities itself are not stable. For example, the Okiluto facility was first priced at USD 4 billion but the actual cost came out to be about USD 7 billion. So there is a huge cost associated with the start up not to mention the fact that it takes around 15 years for a facility to be built.

He added that the price of nuclear energy is going up and at the same time the price of renewable energy is going down. It makes more sense to move towards solar or wind energy. Many delegates also raised the issue of ethical obligation of nuclear waste disposal.

Source - Trade Arabia

(www.steelguru.com)

This is alternative content.

/
Arcelor
Middle East News