Conservative councillors in Swansea rally behind a motion urging Tata Steel to safeguard one blast furnace at Port Talbot, reports Neath & Talbot Herald. The proposed closure of both furnaces, part of Tata's £1.25 billion investment in an electric arc furnace, could lead to significant local economic losses and increased reliance on foreign "virgin" steel. While supporting decarbonization, councillors emphasize the need for a managed transition and call for a task force to explore options. The motion underscores concerns about national defense, job losses, and the UK's carbon emissions.
In a pivotal council meeting in Swansea, Conservative councillors throw their support behind a motion advocating for the retention of one of Tata Steel's two blast furnaces at Port Talbot. The motion, initially brought forward by Labour and Liberal Democrat councillors, gains unanimous approval, highlighting the cross-party concern over the potential closure's impact.
The motion underscores the economic ramifications of Tata Steel's planned closure of both blast furnaces at Port Talbot, estimating a loss of over £100 million per year in direct wages alone. The dire consequence of job losses and the potential reliance on overseas "virgin" steel prompts the council to urge Tata Steel to reconsider its decision.
During the debate, Councillor Lyndon Jones, leader of the Swansea Conservatives, emphasizes the importance of retaining the capacity for high-quality steel production. Tata Steel's £1.25 billion investment in an electric arc furnace, backed by a £500 million contribution from the UK Government, aims to recycle scrap steel, reducing carbon emissions but also leading to approximately 2,800 job cuts, primarily in Port Talbot.
The motion acknowledges the need for decarbonization but calls for a managed transition towards low and zero-carbon methods. The council proposes the establishment of a fully representative regional task force to thoroughly examine options that protect jobs and steel-making opportunities.
Council leader Rob Stewart expresses his concern over the devastating job losses and highlights the reliance of an electric arc furnace on a competitive energy price. He questions the move away from virgin steel-making capacity, emphasizing its importance from both a defense and carbon emissions standpoint.
Councillor Chris Holley, leader of Swansea's Liberal Democrats, draws attention to the decades-long decimation of the steel industry in the region. He underscores the lack of a safety net akin to the financial sector during the 2008 crisis, lamenting the loss of a vital part of the infrastructure.
Conservative Councillor Will Thomas expresses dismay at Tata's decision and hopes for a reversal, echoing the concerns raised within the party. The impending job losses are deemed deeply impactful, prompting calls to explore all possible avenues to preserve employment.
Labour Councillor Andrea Lewis raises a crucial question about the potential manufacturing of high-quality steel at Port Talbot for future offshore wind turbines. Industry body UK Steel contends that electric arc furnace technology can produce specialized steel for sectors like aerospace and defense.
The council's unanimous support for the motion reflects a collective plea to preserve the steel legacy in Swansea. The battle for the blast furnaces takes center stage, balancing the imperative of decarbonization with the need to protect local jobs, national defense interests, and the UK's carbon emissions.