SynopsisThe Commission has initiated a review under the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess whether revoking the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar imports from India would result in continued or recurring harm. Interested parties have until October 2, 2023, to provide relevant information. This review marks the fifth such assessment, with previous orders renewed based on five-year reviews. The Commission will determine the need for a full or expedited review based on responses received.ArticleIn a significant development, the Commission has commenced a comprehensive review under the Tariff Act of 1930 to evaluate the potential consequences of revoking the antidumping duty order related to stainless steel bar imports from India. This assessment aims to ascertain whether such revocation would lead to sustained or recurring damage to domestic industries.This action follows a historical backdrop dating back to February 21, 1995, when the Department of Commerce issued the initial antidumping duty order on imports of stainless steel bar from India. Subsequently, this order underwent several renewals following comprehensive five-year reviews conducted by Commerce and the Commission. These reviews resulted in the continuation of the antidumping duty order, with effectiveness noted on various dates, including April 18, 2001 (66 FR 19919), January 23, 2007 (72 FR 2858), August 9, 2012 (77 FR 47595), and October 3, 2018 (83 FR 49910).At present, the Commission embarks on the fifth review, guided by the provisions of section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The core objective of this review is to determine whether the revocation of the existing order would likely result in continued or recurrent harm to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable timeframe.For those keen on delving deeper into the procedural aspects of this undertaking, the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure offer comprehensive insights, particularly in 19 CFR part 201 (subparts A and B) and 19 CFR part 207 (subparts A and F). The evaluation of interested party responses to this notice of institution will guide the Commission in determining whether a full review or an expedited review is warranted.It's important to note that the Commission's decision during any expedited review will be rooted in the available facts, which may encompass information provided in response to this initiation notice. The outcome of this review holds significance for trade relations and the industry at large.ConclusionAs the review progresses, stakeholders and interested parties are encouraged to participate actively, ensuring their voices are heard in this crucial assessment.